Innovation and Tradition – The Genius of the AND

From Tradition to Innovation – The Grand Challenge facing many large organizations

Dave Whittington, December 17, 2014

I was making a presentation and facilitating a conversation about innovation last week in Vancouver. The final part of my presentation was about the organizational context in which innovators need to operate and the challenges faced in many large organizations. During the ensuing conversation one participant observed that we perhaps needed to better understand how to make a business case for innovation. That got me thinking, and hence this blog.

I’m going to simplify things to make my case, and I know that real life is always more complex, but I think some of the ideas here might have value all the same. The normal route to a business case for innovation would go something like this. List what is wrong with the current state, and paint a vivid picture of the advantages to be gained by being innovative. On the face of it this makes a lot of sense. When you look at established models for leading change, such as John Kotter’s seven steps, we see the need to clearly state what is wrong with the current situation and communicate a vision of where we should be going.

There’s a downside to this approach, and I’m going borrow heavily from Barry Johnson’s work on Polarity Management to explain why. Let’s start by assuming that Tradition and Innovation are two sides of a polarity. So in any large organization there will be fans of tradition and fans of Innovation and they compete with each other for attention. There will be zealots on either side, but reasonable people would have to accept that there are positives and negatives on both sides. The first step in managing this polarity is to map the positives and negatives for either side.

Tradition Innovation Polarity

Now we can see where the normal business case fits. It’s a clear call for a move from bottom left (the downside of tradition) to top right (the upside of innovation). The problem with this straightforward call to action is that it only acknowledges half of the issues and has the effect of further polarizing the situation with each camp becoming more firmly entrenched in their beliefs that “the other side” just doesn’t “get it”.

Why innovators need to embrace tradition

The way out of this is simple, but somewhat counter intuitive, and not a part of any model for leading change that I’ve ever seen. We first need to accept that there are positives on both sides. There are also negatives on both sides. If we are to have any chance of bringing on board the tradition bearers in the organization, we have to acknowledge the legitimacy of their perspective. We have to change the conversation from a left vs. right argument, to a top vs. bottom dialogue, because we can all (except for some of the extremists perhaps) appreciate the value of the positives on both sides and acknowledge the potential negatives of both too.

The business case goes something like this. “There are some real positives to the traditions we’ve built up in this organization and we do not want to lose them. We also acknowledge that there are potential pitfalls if a push to being more innovative isn’t well thought through. However, right now, we need innovate in some critical areas because our current way of doing things is not serving us as well as it has done in the past.”

You see, instead of simply talking about the down side of bottom left and up side of top right, we’ve acknowledged the whole system. We’ve also done this in a very particular order that involves acknowledging the position of the tradition bearers first, and making the case for innovation second. There’s a basic rule of communication that says that people are more likely to listen after they first know that they have been heard.

This shift to valuing both the positives of innovation and the positives of tradition is a great example of moving away from either-or thinking and as Jim Collins clearly stated in Built to Last, “embracing the genius of the ‘and’”. More recently, this capacity to reconcile what look like oppositional ideals was recognized as a critical skill for organizational leaders by Roger Martin in The Opposable Mind. This cognitive skill is also a key component of great innovators. According to Dyer and Gregersen, Associational Thinking is a key cognitive skill in the Innovator’s DNA.

To summarize, if we are to make an effective case for more innovation in the large organizations we work in, we have to embrace the genius of the ‘and’, practice associational thinking, and acknowledge the value of the traditional.

How to encourage creativity and innovation

In the last few years I’ve been seeing a pattern emerge in the strategic objectives of organizations I work with. This focus on innovation and creativity is not just a bandwagon that’s being jumped on. I believe this is an intuitive and direct response to the trend towards volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity (the VUCA world) that we’re all living in.

Turning the strategic goal of innovation into reality is the struggle. I think the problem stems from the fact that innovation is a cultural phenomenon and not something that can be easily dictated.

If the organization you work in has innovation and/or creativity in its strategic goals, here are five things you can do to encourage innovation and creativity and start building the organizational culture you need:

  1. Develop it, at every level. Not only does investment in staff development give people the tools they need to be creative, it also sends a message that says the organization is prepared to invest in a new of doing things. It’s really important that the development opportunities are embraced by every level of the organization. There are lots of options here, from a visit to Stanford’s d.school to local, and more affordable, creativity workshops.
  2. Demonstrate it, from the top down, by showing commitment to the ideas above. If an organization can find really creative ways to celebrate, train, reward and make time for innovation, then they’ll be in great shape for making it a cultural norm. Walking the talk is the most powerful way that senior leadership influence organizational culture. Innovation and creativity are as much to do with culture as they are to do with strategy.
  3. Reward it, quite simply, by making it a part of your performance review framework.
  4. Make space for it, in even the busiest schedules. There are stories going around of how some organizations allow their employees a half day a week to work on anything they like. This might seem outrageous; to give away 10% seems crazy. However, if you consider the value that you get from 90% of an engaged workforce versus 100% of a disengaged workforce, I know which I’d prefer, and I get the added benefit of all those creative ideas from the 10%.
  5. Celebrate it, especially when it fails. The end of the 20th century and early 21st century has been a time a time to tighten belts and batten down the hatches. We’ve generally become quite risk averse and failure is seen as unacceptable. Being innovative naturally involves trying things out, and not everything we try out is going to be successful. If we’re to be truly innovative we need to celebrate innovation wherever it occurs, and most importantly, we need to celebrate innovation for the sake of innovation, and not just for the successes it sometimes brings.

Any organization that’s really serious about innovation and creativity needs to pay attention to its culture as well as its strategy. The two need to work hand in hand. Org strategy supports and informs org culture. Org culture supports and informs org strategy.

Dave Whittington – June 2014

Thinking with your Hands

Thinking with your Hands

I remember when I was growing up, I had my fingers in everything. I couldn’t help myself. I always had to pick things up, and if I could, I’d take them apart. I remember my Mum pleading with me, “Look with your eyes and not with your fingers”. I was fortunate that I grew up with Lego, Meccano, the most amazing chemistry set, at least two soldering irons, etc. I built my own Scalextric cars, which were pretty good, but were never quite as fast as the best you could buy off the shelf, but that wasn’t the point.

I was also fortunate that I went to a “technical” school after passing the now infamous “11 plus” exam. The school had great labs and workshops, and I was further encouraged to think with my hands, but in a much less creative way. There was no crossover between the subjects. I even remember that “Art Metalwork” and “Engineering Metalwork” were taught by different staff in different workshops. At age 14 I wanted to study car maintenance (remember the Scalextric) … but it wasn’t an option for me as I was on the “academic track”. Slowly but surely I was encouraged to think less and less with my hands.

Now in my early 50s, I’m rediscovering how much fun it is to build stuff. There’s so much going on right now. I’m not sure who’s leading the charge, but the folks at IDEO have been enormously influential, as has Sir Ken Robinson’s TED talk of 2006, which now has over 25 million views. Prototyping, playing and building are key concepts in the plethora of frameworks for innovation and creativity that are being published just now. It’s as if we’re coming out of the dark ages of creativity with a whole bunch of new tools to play with. It’s very exciting.

At a personal level, I have a Raspberry Pi that has opened up a whole new world of stuff to build. I once again own a soldering iron and I have more hand tools than will fit in their box. I’m making stuff again, and my brain is energized. At a professional level, I’m doing some really interesting work with IDEO’s Human Centered Design (HCD) toolkit, and I’m finding inspiration in the increasing interest in workplace innovation. As a society, I’m hoping that we’re entering a renaissance for thinking with your hands. Sorry Mum, I just can’t help myself.

Calliope Learning – Finalist in 2010 Technology Awards

VIATeC Awards 2010 Logo We got really exciting news last week. We’ve been nominated for an award in VIATeC’s 2010 Technology Awards. These are like the oscars for our local technology companies. We’ve been nominated in the “Members Choice for Service Provider of the Year” category. We’re blown away by this recognition.

We’ve sponsored the Employer of the Year award since 2008. It’ll be wonderful to be at the awards ceremony as a nominee as well as a sponsor this year.

Human Development at IDEO

Here’s a short (5:32), inspiring (IMHO), video about Talent Managment at IDEO.

Big hat tip to Jay Cross for the video 🙂

I had to watch it twice to “get it”.

Dave

BTBTYCB Lighten Up

Be The Best That You Can Be — Stage Three — Lighten Up

I’ve been working on this project for a little while and I feel it’s time to give it a little bit of an airing. For a few years I’ve used the phrase “helping you be the best that you can be” to describe my role, whether I’m coaching or facilitating leadership development. I thought it was time to figure out exactly what I meant when I said this. This led me to develop a five stage plan that I believe anyone can follow in order to be the best that they can be. A lofty goal I know, but it has been fun putting this together and I’d love to get some feedback.

The five stages of the plan are:

  1. Know yourself
  2. Have clear goals
  3. Lighten up
  4. Persevere
  5. Embrace paradox

This blog post will briefly outline stage three of the plan. Future posts will explore the last two stages.

Laughter is the best medicine.

Being the best that you can be is too important to be taken (too) seriously!

Allow me to explain. Most of the really successful people that I’ve met always seem to be laughing a lot. They’re having a good time, they’re fit and well both physically and mentally. I don’t think we can ever be the best that we can be if we’re sick, stressed, or in some other way, not at the top of our game. We need balance and laughter in our lives, these lead to health and well being, which are of course precursors to being the best that you can be.

Lightening up isn’t something to do alone. We need to have good relationships with people around us. When we take ourselves too seriously we lose perspective. We begin to believe that our concerns are the only ones that matter. We lose sight of the fact that our success is more often than not dependent on the success of others. And vice versa.

Happy Holidays, enjoy this seasonal break, don’t take yourself too seriously and make sure you find time to laugh with friends.

Dave

Be The Best That You Can Be — Part One — Know Yourself

I’ve been working on this project for a little while and I feel it’s time to give it a little bit of an airing. For a few years I’ve used the phrase “helping you be the best that you can be” to describe my role, whether I’m coaching or facilitating leadership development. I thought it was time to figure out exactly what I meant when I said this. This led me to develop a five stage plan that I believe anyone can follow in order to be the best that they can be. A lofty goal I know, but it has been fun putting this together and I’d love to get some feedback (getting feedback is of course a feature of the plan).

The five stages of the plan are:

  1. Know yourself
  2. Have clear goals
  3. Lighten up
  4. Persevere
  5. Embrace paradox

This blog post will explore stage one of the plan. Future posts will explore the other four stages.

Knowing yourself seems pretty straightforward, but I think this is a life’s work. I know I’m still working on it. For the purposes of BTBTYCB (you knew I’d have to use the acronym sooner or later didn’t you) I’ve broken this stage into four facets. The first facet and the simplest to achieve, is to know your weaknesses. For most people this won’t be a challenge, we all know what we’re not good at. I’m not good at paying attention to details. I know that I have to write things down or else I forget them in seconds. I’m also not good at staying focused. I no longer fight this one. I have iTunes and my email running on my desktop while I write this blog! There are many ways we come to discover our weaknesses, but if we want to be the best that we can be, we need to know what our weaknesses are and how we’re going to manage them.

The second facet of knowing yourself is knowing your strengths. We usually focus less on our strengths than we do on our weaknesses. If we’re going to be the best that we can be then we have to play to our strengths, it just makes sense doesn’t it. However, most people I’ve met aren’t too clear about what their true strengths are. They usually know what they’re good at, but this isn’t necessarily a natural strength. I’m a half decent computer programmer (ten years ago I was anyway) but it’s not a strength, it’s just something I practiced a lot and got paid well for. Strengths Finder (by Tom Rath of Gallup) really helped me figure out my true strengths and now I’m much more conscious about how I play to them.

The third facet of knowing yourself is knowing your values. Values get talked about a lot. Barack Obama has highlighted the call for values-based leadership but the concept of values-based rather than rule-based leadership and decision making has been around for a long time. Many believe our current economic crisis is a result of a flawed reliance on rule-based systems. Clearly, you’ll be the best that you can be when you live a life that’s congruent with your values. To do this you first need to be absolutely clear about what your values are, and then start living them. If you’re not sure what it is in your life that you value then check your credit card statement and/or figure out how you spend your time. Both of these will give you clues into what you truly value.

I hinted earlier at the final facet of knowing yourself. Figuring out who you are can be a soul searching experience but introspection only goes so far before it becomes naval gazing. If you really want to know yourself then you need to know how others see you and you can only find that out by asking them for feedback. Good honest feedback is hard to come by. Friends and family can be too kind and strangers don’t know you well enough. Work-based 360 feedback can be really helpful but not everyone has access to this. Tools like rypple.com can help you gather honest feedback. The key to receiving feedback is to be open to hearing it. You’re only really listening to feedback if you’re willing to change your mind about the thing you’re asking about.

That’s a sneak peek at stage one. Clearly each facet is worthy of a book or two in its own right, but that wouldn’t make for a manageable BTBTYCB plan! What do you think? Watch this space for the rest of the BTBTYCB plan.

Canadian National Values Assessment

In May 2009 1251 Canadians identified their top ten personal values, their top ten values describing the current culture of Canada and their top ten values for a future desired Canadian culture. Last week (Nov 3rd 2009) the results were published (see www.royalroads.ca/tti). As a relative newcomer to Canada and as someone fascinated by values and organizational culture, I couldn’t let this pass without comment.

The results show a strong agreement between all regions and age ranges. This was somewhat surprising as I’d been led to believe that there would be a difference between Anglophone and Francophone cultures. I also thought there might be discrepancies between the generations. As far as values are concerned, Canadians seem to be more homogeneous than I’d expected.

Summary of Canadian Values May 2009

Personal Values Current Culture Values Desired Culture Values
  1. Honesty
  2. Family
  3. Caring
  4. Humor/fun
  5. Respect
  6. Friendship
  7. Responsibility
  8. Positive attitude
  9. Trust
  10. Patience
  1. Bureaucracy
  2. Human Rights
  3. Freedom of Speech
  4. Wasted Resources
  5. Unemployment
  6. Crime/violence
  7. Law Enforcement
  8. Corruption
  9. Uncertainty about the future
  10. Quality of life
  1. Accountability
  2. Caring for the elderly
  3. Affordable housing
  4. Effective health care
  5. Caring for the disadvantaged
  6. Concern for future generations
  7. Poverty reduction
  8. Employment opportunities
  9. Human rights
  10. Governmental effectiveness

Personal value themes show what I have come to understand as a typically Canadian emphasis around honesty/respect, family/friendship along with humour/fun/positive attitude. No surprises for me here. This is one of the main reasons I love living in Canada!

Positive current culture themes around human rights and quality of life didn’t surprise me either. Having travelled widely, I really do believe that Canada is a great place to live. However there were also some strong negative themes around bureaucracy/corruption, wasted resources and unemployment/crime/violence. What is your personal perspective on this?

Overall the potentially limiting or dysfunctional values polled 32% of the selections. This figure of 32% is a measure for the dysfunction or cultural entropy in our current culture. Canada is the seventh nation to implement the National Values Assessment created by the Richard Barrett Values Centre (www.valuescentre.com). An entropy of 32% put us at a similar level to Sweden (31%), more dysfunctional than Denmark (21%), but in a much better position than the US (52%) and Argentina (60%). Don’t you just love these league tables!

The major emphasis in the desired culture is caring. From my perspective at least, 8 out of the top 10 values in a desired Canadian culture are about caring. From #2 to #8 we have caring for the elderly, homeless, sick, disadvantaged, future generations, poor and unemployed. Add human rights to the list and it’s clear to me that caring for others is enormously important. The final values in the top ten desired culture list are accountability and governmental effectiveness. These look to me like a clear reflection of some of the negative themes in the current culture.

I believe that there is a clear message here for business leaders who are building organizational cultures. If you want to build a culture that is aligned with the values of your employees then you absolutely have to show that you care. You have to show that you care about people, all people. You also have to demonstrate honesty and accountability. You have respect work life/balance. And you need to do all of this while having fun and maintaining a positive attitude. A tall order indeed, but one that I’m confidant is achievable.

Organizational Culture and Leadership

I was recently presenting at a high tech sector human resources conference and was asked a great question that really got me thinking. The question was something like “Isn’t it the senior management’s responsibility to define the organizations culture?”

What a great question. The short answer is probably “Yes.” An organization’s senior team has a big influence of the organization’s culture. After all, they call the shots and model the behaviours that set the tone for the organization. Unfortunately, from my perspective at least, there is a problem with this. The senior team, more often than not, put in long hours, focus on little else but work, and some of them take themselves way too seriously!

Thankfully, there’s a longer answer to the question. While the senior team have an undeniably strong influence over an organization’s culture, there are others in the organization that can have a powerful influence.

Imagine a programmer who is a keen soccer player. She takes the time to organize a team to play in a local league. She’s contributing to a culture that values teamwork, exercise and competitiveness. Imagine an office manager who knows when everybody’s birthday is. He brings in a birthday card and gets as many people as possible to sign it. Maybe there are also muffins? He’s developing a sense of belonging within the organizational culture. Imagine the small team of volunteers who organize the organization’s United Way fund raising efforts. They’re contributing to the organization’s sense of community involvement and service.

So my final answer to the question looks a bit like this. Organizational culture can’t be mandated from the top. For sure, the people at the top of the organization have a powerful influence over the organizational culture and they must be careful how they use that influence. We also have to recognize that anyone who chooses to step up to the challenge can have a profound influence over culture no matter where they stand on the organizational hierarchy. This is one reason why I believe true leadership isn’t a position but a way of being.

Strengths Based Leadership – Book Review

Strengths Based Leadership, ( C4UFXFKV2WPY BKSH2JUWWW75 )

by Tom Rath and Barry Conchie, is a wonderful little book. We’ve used it with a few different clients and I think everyone has found it a useful framework for thinking about leadership. Each copy of the book provides access to an online strengths inventory assessment tool that reports back your top five strengths.

The idea of paying attention to and building on your strengths makes a lot of sense to me. Clearly we all still need to be aware of weaknesses, but we also need to build our strengths. Of course, this whole topic deserves a blog in its own right.

The book is based on the 34 strengths introduced in the Strengths Finder 2.0 inventory. Based on your strengths it provides suggestions for how to improve your leadership in four domains; Executing, Influencing, Relationship Building, and Strategic Thinking. It’s well worth checking out. And no, we’re not on a commision 🙂

Tammy and I would love to hear from you if you’ve completed the inventory and have any questions.

Dave